The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) challenges the existence of genetic drift and Ka/Ks ratios


The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) challenges the existence of genetic drift by offering a broader perspective on how evolution occurs, which can lead to a reinterpretation of genetic drift's role.

Genetic Drift in the Modern Synthesis

In the traditional Modern Synthesis of evolutionary theory, genetic drift is considered one of the main mechanisms of evolution, alongside natural selection. Genetic drift refers to the random fluctuations in allele frequencies within a population, particularly pronounced in small populations. This randomness can lead to the fixation of certain traits, even if they aren't necessarily advantageous.

EES and a Broader View

The EES replaces the Modern Synthesis by emphasizing additional factors and processes that influence evolution:

  1. Developmental Bias: The EES recognizes that the development of organisms isn't a blank slate. Developmental processes can bias the types of variations that arise, making some evolutionary trajectories more likely than others. This means that genetic drift might not be entirely random, as developmental constraints can influence the variations available for drift to act upon.

  2. Plasticity: Organisms can respond to their environments with phenotypic plasticity, which means that a single genotype can produce different phenotypes depending on environmental conditions. The EES suggests that plasticity can play a role in evolution by facilitating adaptation to new environments and potentially influencing the direction of genetic drift.

  3. Niche Construction: Organisms actively modify their environments, creating niches that can, in turn, affect their own evolution. This feedback loop between organisms and their environments means that genetic drift might operate within a dynamic landscape that is shaped by the organisms themselves.

  4. Inclusive Inheritance: The EES considers a broader range of inheritance mechanisms beyond genetic inheritance, such as epigenetic inheritance and cultural transmission. This suggests that genetic drift might not be the only factor affecting the inheritance of traits and that other mechanisms could interact with or even counteract genetic drift.

Reinterpreting Genetic Drift

The EES challenges genetic drift in offering a more nuanced understanding of its role in evolution. By incorporating developmental bias, plasticity, niche construction, and inclusive inheritance, the EES suggests that genetic drift operates within a complex web of factors, rather than being a purely random force.

In this broader perspective, genetic drift might be seen as interacting with other evolutionary processes, sometimes being amplified or constrained by them. For example, developmental bias could limit the range of variations available for drift, while plasticity could allow populations to persist in the face of drift by adapting to new conditions.

In Summary

The EES challenges the traditional view of genetic drift by emphasizing the interplay of various factors in evolution. While genetic drift remains an important mechanism, the EES suggests that it operates within a dynamic and complex landscape shaped by developmental bias, plasticity, niche construction, and inclusive inheritance. This broader perspective offers a more nuanced understanding of how evolution occurs and how genetic drift contributes to the diversity of life.


Nonneutral synonymous mutations challenge the traditional view of genetic drift in several ways:

Genetic Drift:

  • The classic understanding of genetic drift posits that it primarily acts on neutral mutations, where changes in allele frequencies occur randomly due to chance events in finite populations.

  • Synonymous mutations, by definition, do not alter the amino acid sequence of a protein, and thus were traditionally considered neutral.

Nonneutral Synonymous Mutations:

  • However, growing evidence suggests that many synonymous mutations can have significant effects on protein function, mRNA stability, splicing efficiency, or translation rate.

  • These effects can lead to differences in fitness, even if they don't change the protein's amino acid composition.

Challenges to Genetic Drift:

  1. Selection: Nonneutral synonymous mutations are subject to “fitness”, as their subtle effects can influence an organism's survival and reproduction. This challenges the notion that genetic drift is the sole or primary driver of their evolution.

  2. Predictability: If synonymous mutations are nonneutral, their frequencies may not change randomly as predicted by genetic drift. Instead, their evolution may be more predictable, depending on their fitness effects.

  3. Evolutionary Rate: Nonneutral synonymous mutations may evolve at different rates than neutral ones. 

  4. Molecular Clock: The assumption of neutrality is often used to calibrate molecular clocks, which estimate divergence times based on mutation rates. If synonymous mutations are not always neutral, this can complicate the interpretation of molecular clock data.

Implications:

  • Recognizing the non-neutrality of some synonymous mutations can help us better understand the complexities of genome evolution.

  • It highlights the importance of considering all potential effects of mutations, even those that don't change protein sequence.

  • It can lead to more accurate models of evolutionary processes and molecular clocks.

Here's how non-neutral synonymous mutations challenge the traditional view of genetic drift and the accuracy of Ka/Ks ratios:

  1. Deleterious Effects: Non-neutral synonymous mutations can negatively impact protein folding, splicing, mRNA stability, and translation efficiency. These effects can reduce an organism's fitness, making them subject to negative selection, similar to non-synonymous mutations.

  2. Genetic Drift's Role: Genetic drift is a random process where allele frequencies fluctuate due to chance. If synonymous mutations are deleterious, their frequency changes wouldn't be solely due to drift but also influenced by “fitness.” This complicates our understanding of how drift and selection interact to shape genetic variation.

  3. Ka/Ks Ratio Inaccuracy: The Ka/Ks ratio is used to infer the type of selection acting on a protein-coding gene. It compares the rate of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) to the rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks). Traditionally, a Ka/Ks ratio < 1 suggests purifying selection (removing deleterious mutations), while Ka/Ks > 1 suggests positive selection (favoring beneficial mutations). However, if synonymous mutations are not neutral, the Ks value may be inflated, leading to inaccurate Ka/Ks ratios and misinterpretations of the selection pressure.

Implications:

  • Evolutionary Studies: Recognizing the non-neutrality of synonymous mutations refines our understanding of how genetic variation arises and is maintained in populations. It highlights that even silent changes at the DNA level can have significant evolutionary consequences.

  • Disease Research: Understanding the deleterious effects of synonymous mutations can shed light on the genetic basis of diseases. It suggests that some disease-causing mutations might be hidden in seemingly silent regions of the genome.

  • Drug Development: This knowledge could inform drug development strategies. For instance, therapies targeting RNA could potentially address the harmful effects of synonymous mutations.

In conclusion, the discovery of non-neutral synonymous mutations challenges the traditional view of genetic drift and the accuracy of Ka/Ks ratios. It emphasizes the complex interplay between drift and selection and the need to consider the potential functional impact of all types of mutations, both synonymous and non-synonymous, in evolutionary and biomedical research.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Neo-Darwinism: How Epigenetics and Functional "Junk" DNA Drive the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

Image
Neo-Darwinism, the modern synthesis of Darwinian evolution with Mendelian genetics, has long been the bedrock of our understanding of how life evolves. It posits that random mutations in DNA sequence, coupled with natural selection, drive the gradual changes we see in species over time. However, recent discoveries in epigenetics and the functionality of "junk" DNA are challenging this traditional view, leading to a new framework known as the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) . Epigenetics: Inheritance Beyond the Sequence Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the underlying DNA sequence as with Neo-Darwinism. These changes, often influenced by environmental factors, can be heritable across generations. This challenges the neo-Darwinian focus on random mutations as the sole source of heritable variation. One of the key mechanisms of epigenetics is DNA methylation , where methyl groups attach to DNA, influencing ge...
Read more

"From the Modern Synthesis to the Inclusive Evolutionary Synthesis: An Einsteinian Revolution in Evolution"

Image
Article by Danchin. The Modern Synthesis (MS) is the prevailing theory of evolution in biology. It was developed in the early 20th century by a group of scientists who integrated Darwin's theory of natural selection with the new science of genetics. The MS holds that evolution is driven by the differential reproduction of genes that confer a fitness advantage in a particular environment. In recent years, however, there has been growing dissatisfaction with the MS. This is because the MS does not adequately account for the role of non-genetic factors in evolution, such as epigenetics, developmental plasticity, and culture. Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence. These changes can be inherited from one generation to the next, and they can have a significant impact on the phenotype (observable characteristics) of an organism. Developmental plasticity is the ability of an organism to change its phenotype i...
Read more

journal article "Deconstructing the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need a New Theory of Evolution?"

Image
The journal article "Deconstructing the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need a New Theory of Evolution?" delves into the ongoing debate surrounding the adequacy of the Modern Synthesis (MS) in explaining the complexities of evolutionary processes. The authors scrutinize the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), a proposed expansion of the MS, and ultimately argue for a more radical shift in evolutionary theory, suggesting a need for a "Unmodern Synthesis." One pivotal quote highlights the historical context of the EES: "Historically, this model builds upon anti-Darwinian models and is based on the epistemological data of contemporary Evo-Devo." This statement underscores the EES's reliance on concepts that were initially rejected by the MS, such as the significance of developmental processes and structuralism. Evo-Devo, or evolutionary developmental biology, has provided crucial insights into how developmental mechanisms influence ...
Read more