Beyond Genes: Exploring Evolution with the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis


Beyond Genes: Exploring Evolution with the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

For decades, the Modern Synthesis served as the foundational framework for understanding evolution. It merged Darwinian selection with Mendelian genetics, demonstrating how populations adapt through random mutations and natural selection acting on genes. However, the relentless advancement of scientific knowledge has revealed the Modern Synthesis' limitations, paving the way for a more comprehensive paradigm - the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES). This essay delves into 15 core principles of the Modern Synthesis and illuminates how the EES expands upon them, offering a richer, more nuanced picture of evolution's intricate tapestry.

1. Variation Arises from Mutations: Both syntheses agree that mutations in DNA are the raw material for evolution. However, the EES acknowledges a wider range of sources, including epigenetic modifications, horizontal gene transfer, and symbiosis.

2. Inheritance via Mendelian Genes: Both frameworks accept Mendelian inheritance as the primary transmission mechanism, but the EES recognizes additional modes like cultural transmission and developmental bias, where certain pathways are pre-disposed to evolve in specific directions. As well horizontal gene transfer of transposons “jumping genes” occur by lateral inheritance versus the vertical inheritance of the MS.

3. Natural Selection as the Driver of Adaptation: While both embrace natural selection as the primary driver of adaptation, the EES emphasizes its multifaceted nature. It considers niche construction, where organisms modify their environment, and phenotypic accommodation, where temporary adjustments can become heritable through epigenetic changes.

4. Gradual Change Driven by Selection: Both frameworks agree that evolution primarily proceeds through small, incremental changes acted upon by selection. However, the EES acknowledges the potential for punctuated bursts of evolution through major developmental or ecological shifts.

5. Genetic Drift as a Random Force: Both recognize genetic drift, the random fluctuation of allele frequencies, as a significant factor in small populations. However, the EES explores its interaction with other evolutionary forces, highlighting its potential to drive adaptation in specific circumstances.

6. Gene-Centric View of Evolution: The Modern Synthesis primarily focused on genes as the units of selection. The EES, however, broadens this perspective, considering genomes, organisms, and even groups as targets of selection depending on the ecological and developmental context.

7. Adaptation Maximizes Fitness: Both frameworks hold that natural selection promotes traits that increase fitness, defined as reproductive success. However, the EES acknowledges that fitness can be complex and context-dependent, shaped by interactions within and between individuals and their environment.

8. Neutral Evolution Plays a Role: Both accept the existence of neutral mutations that have no impact on fitness. However, the EES suggests that neutral mutations can have downstream effects, influencing gene function and the evolution of regulatory networks.

9. Developmental Processes are Relevant: While the Modern Synthesis acknowledged development, it primarily viewed it as a passive translation of genes into phenotypes. The EES, however, highlights the active role of development, emphasizing how developmental constraints and biases can shape evolutionary trajectories.

10. Phenotypic Plasticity Matters: Both recognize phenotypic plasticity, the ability of a genotype to produce different phenotypes in different environments. However, the EES emphasizes its potential to facilitate adaptation and even guide the direction of evolution through Baldwin effects.

11. Symbiosis and Cooperation are Important: While the Modern Synthesis acknowledged symbiosis, it primarily focused on individual selection. The EES recognizes the crucial role of cooperation and symbiosis in evolution, including the potential for group-level selection and the evolution of complex social behaviors.

12. Niche Construction Shapes Evolution: The Modern Synthesis largely neglected niche construction, where organisms modify their environment. The EES emphasizes its profound impact on evolution, highlighting how organisms can engineer environments that favor their own evolution and the evolution of other species.

13. Epigenetics Influences Evolution: While the Modern Synthesis considered genes as the sole units of inheritance, the EES recognizes the role of epigenetics, heritable changes in gene expression that can impact both development and evolution.

14. Evolution is Not Always Optimizing: The Modern Synthesis often portrayed evolution as maximizing fitness. The EES recognizes that evolution can lead to suboptimal outcomes due to historical constraints, developmental biases, and trade-offs between different traits.

15. Evolutionary Processes are Interconnected: Both frameworks acknowledge the interplay of different evolutionary forces. However, the EES emphasizes the intricate interconnectedness of all evolutionary processes, where each force can influence and be influenced by others in a dynamic and context-dependent manner.

In conclusion, the EES replaces the Modern Synthesis. By incorporating new discoveries and expanding the lens through which we view evolution, the EES provides a richer, more nuanced understanding of this grand, ongoing process. As we continue to explore the hidden depths of biology, the EES stands as a powerful tool for illuminating the intricate dance of life's relentless transformation.

Ref:

Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary


Incommensurability and the extended evolutionary synthesis: taking Kuhn seriously


On the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Neo-Darwinism: How Epigenetics and Functional "Junk" DNA Drive the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

Image
Neo-Darwinism, the modern synthesis of Darwinian evolution with Mendelian genetics, has long been the bedrock of our understanding of how life evolves. It posits that random mutations in DNA sequence, coupled with natural selection, drive the gradual changes we see in species over time. However, recent discoveries in epigenetics and the functionality of "junk" DNA are challenging this traditional view, leading to a new framework known as the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) . Epigenetics: Inheritance Beyond the Sequence Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the underlying DNA sequence as with Neo-Darwinism. These changes, often influenced by environmental factors, can be heritable across generations. This challenges the neo-Darwinian focus on random mutations as the sole source of heritable variation. One of the key mechanisms of epigenetics is DNA methylation , where methyl groups attach to DNA, influencing ge...
Read more

"From the Modern Synthesis to the Inclusive Evolutionary Synthesis: An Einsteinian Revolution in Evolution"

Image
Article by Danchin. The Modern Synthesis (MS) is the prevailing theory of evolution in biology. It was developed in the early 20th century by a group of scientists who integrated Darwin's theory of natural selection with the new science of genetics. The MS holds that evolution is driven by the differential reproduction of genes that confer a fitness advantage in a particular environment. In recent years, however, there has been growing dissatisfaction with the MS. This is because the MS does not adequately account for the role of non-genetic factors in evolution, such as epigenetics, developmental plasticity, and culture. Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence. These changes can be inherited from one generation to the next, and they can have a significant impact on the phenotype (observable characteristics) of an organism. Developmental plasticity is the ability of an organism to change its phenotype i...
Read more

journal article "Deconstructing the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need a New Theory of Evolution?"

Image
The journal article "Deconstructing the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need a New Theory of Evolution?" delves into the ongoing debate surrounding the adequacy of the Modern Synthesis (MS) in explaining the complexities of evolutionary processes. The authors scrutinize the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), a proposed expansion of the MS, and ultimately argue for a more radical shift in evolutionary theory, suggesting a need for a "Unmodern Synthesis." One pivotal quote highlights the historical context of the EES: "Historically, this model builds upon anti-Darwinian models and is based on the epistemological data of contemporary Evo-Devo." This statement underscores the EES's reliance on concepts that were initially rejected by the MS, such as the significance of developmental processes and structuralism. Evo-Devo, or evolutionary developmental biology, has provided crucial insights into how developmental mechanisms influence ...
Read more